So, too, did everyone else involved, from Jimmy Miller, the producer, to Marshall Chess, the young Atlantic Records executive, to the rest of the group and their extended retinue of session players, studio technicians and hangers-on. On Exile on Main St, though, Jagger, for once, rolled with Richards. "Me, I'm just happy to wake up and see who's hanging around. "Mick needs to know what he's going to do tomorrow," says Richards, his voice slurring into a laugh. There is a great moment in Stones in Exile, a new documentary about the making of Exile on Main St in 1971, when Keith Richards defines the essential difference in temperament between Mick Jagger and himself. The book substantiates the rumour of the affair, but does not connect it to Richards's heroin addiction. We reported that another rumour in the book "has Jagger bedding Pallenberg while Richards has nodded out on heroin". We should make it clear that the book discounts the rumour, stating that the employee, who was motivated by a desire to blackmail Pallenberg, did not even have a daughter. In this article we said Robert Greenfield in his book subtitled "A season in hell with the Rolling Stones" had aired a rumour "which he did not confirm or refute" that Anita Pallenberg had encouraged the teenage daughter of an employee to inject heroin for the first time. The following correction was printed in the Observer's For the record column, Sunday
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |